Millions of small businesses—and their lawyers—were again relieved of the fast-approaching January deadline to submit the companies’ beneficial ownership information to the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) under the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) when the Fifth Circuit issued a new order on December 26 reinstating an earlier nationwide injunction that had suspended those requirements indefinitely before a Fifth Circuit panel briefly lifted the injunction on December 23.
The CTA and its implementing regulations require more than 32 million small businesses and other entities in the U.S. (known as “reporting companies”) to file reports with FinCEN identifying their “beneficial owners” to help the agency combat money laundering. Beneficial owners are defined as the individuals who directly or indirectly own or control the company. Willful failure by companies to file their initial beneficial ownership reports by the original January 1, 2025 deadline (recently extended by FinCEN to January 13 before the Fifth Circuit’s latest ruling)—or willfully filing false or fraudulent information—can result in a $500 per day civil penalty, up to $10,000 in fines, and two years in federal prison.
On December 3, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas issued a sweeping nationwide preliminary injunction in Texas Top Cop Shop v. Garland et al., No. 4:24-cv-478 (E.D. Tex. Dec 3, 2024) that temporarily blocked the enforcement of the CTA and its implementing regulations. After concluding that Congress exceeded its constitutional authority under the Commerce Clause and the Necessary and Proper Clause when it enacted the CTA, the district court enjoined the enforcement of the Act and its regulations, stayed the original January 1, 2025 reporting deadline, and declared that reporting companies need not comply with that deadline “pending further order of the Court.”
The district court’s nationwide injunction proved to be short-lived, however, when a three judge motions panel of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals issued an order on December 23 granting the government’s emergency motion for a stay pending appeal, lifting the injunction, and expediting the appeal “to the next available oral argument panel.” In the order, the Fifth Circuit panel concluded that the government “made a strong showing that it is likely to succeed on the merits in defending [the] CTA’s constitutionality” because in the panel’s view, Congress acted within its powers under the Commerce Clause in enacting the CTA.