Title
CJWI07correxPDF.qxp
By
calungce
Description
33 CRIMINAL JUSTICE ■ Winter 2007 Circuit decisions that reject Penry error “whenever the former special issues might have afforded some indirect consideration of the defendant’s mitigating evidence?” 3. Does the Fifth Circuit’s requirement that mental disorders be “severe, permanent, or untreatable” to warrant relief under Penry contradiic this Court’s rebuke of the “constitutional relevannce threshold test for mitigating evidence? 4.) Did the prosecution prevent [petitioner’s] jury from fully...

Advertisement