- ABA Groups
- Resources for Lawyers
- About Us
Leslie Richards-Yellen is the Chief Diversity and Inclusion Officer at Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP in Chicago, Illinois. She may be reached at LRY@hinshawlaw.com.
Hiring is a critical process for every enterprise, the legal field included. Whether an employer is seeking to attract and retain clients, or an in-house department servicing the company’s needs, it is essential to identify prospective new hires who have great skills and will fit into the culture of your business.
With so much at stake, there should be a great incentive to ensure that the process is engineered to be as efficient as possible with the goal of breaking down any barrier to an honest appraisal of each potential candidate. However, based on a vast amount of data derived from the Implicit Association Test (IAT) (https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/demo/takeatest.html), it is clear that ingrained, unconscious biases may cause us to perceive others based on stereotypes rather than on individual merit.
The IAT can measure your implicit attitude toward many different groups. For example, there are tests to measure your implicit bias based on race/ethnicity, skin tone, religion, sexual orientation, disability, age, weight, and other factors. Data from the IAT shows that the advancement of women is hampered by stereotypes linking women to home and family. A study shows that when evaluating identical resumes, participants were more likely to interview an attorney with a name more often identified with Caucasian-Americans rather than a name identified with African-Americans. Mock jurors were more likely to associate Caucasian-American males than Asian-American males with traits identified with being a litigator.
So, how do employers ensure that it is more likely that optimal hiring decisions are made consistently?
Through conscious awareness and use of these techniques, you can maximize the likelihood that hiring decisions will be based on merit, not bias.