Section of Taxation Publications
  VOL. 53
NO. 3
SPRING 2000
Contents | TTL Home

 
 Note: The following is an excerpt from the introduction to the article as published in The Tax Lawyer. Author citations have been omitted for brevity. Tax Section members may read the article in its entirety in Adobe Acrobat format.
 
 

NOTE
COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL DEFENSE DISALLOWED WHEN NOT INITIALLY RAISED DURING ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING: TRUE V. UNITED STATES

In True v. United States,1 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit held that collateral estoppel claims omitted from an administrative refund filing were deemed waived for purposes of judicial review. The court then applied the step transaction doctrine to taxpayers’ oil and gas transactions and concluded that the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the government, on the grounds that the taxpayer manipulated interdependent transactions toward an intended purpose, was insufficiently supported by evidence to preclude the existence of a genuine issue of material fact.
Part I of this Note summarizes the background and facts of True II. Part II discusses the holdings of the district court and the Tenth Circuit. Part III analyzes the Tenth Circuit’s decision and concludes that it purposefully established new common law.


 
 

Published by
Section of Taxation, American Bar Association
With the Assistance of
Georgetown University Law Center

 

If you are an ABA member, you can receive The Tax Lawyer and the Section NewsQuarterly, both quarterly publications, when you join the Section of Taxation. Anyone can subscribe to The Tax Lawyer by contacting the ABA Service Center.