Case Highlights 2005-2006 Term

Each summer, Preview highlights the key rulings from every Supreme Court decision handed down throughout the term. These case highlights are arranged both by case name and topical area and include the vote breakdown and an excerpt from the majority or plurality opinion. (In the interests of readability, most citations and internal quotes are omitted from these opinion excerpts.)

Case Name

Anza, et al. v. Ideal Steel Supply Corp.

Arbaugh v. Y&H Corp.

Arkansas Department of Health and Human Services v. Ahlborn

rlington Central School District Board of Education v. Murphy

Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, et al.

Beard v. Banks

Brigham City, Utah v. Stuart et al.

Brown v. Sanders

Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. Cardegna et al.

Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. White

Central Virginia Community College, et al. v. Katz

Clark v. Arizona

DaimlerChrysler Corp., et al. v. Cuno, et al.

Davis v. Washington

Day v. McDonough (formerly Day v. Crosby)

Dixon v. United States

Dolan v. United States Postal Service et al.

Domino's Pizza Inc, et al. v. McDonald

eBay Inc. v. MercExchange L.L.C.

Empire HealthChoice Assurance, Inc. v. McVeigh

Evans v. Chavis

Fernandez-Vargas v. Gonzales

Garcetti, et al. v. Ceballos

Georgia v. Randolph

Gonzales v. Oregon et al.

Gonzales et al. v. O Centro Espirita Beneficente Unias Do Vegetal et al.

Hamdan v. Rumsfeld

Hartman et al. v. Moore

Hill v. McDonough, et al.

Holmes v. South Carolina

House v. Bell

Howard Delivery Service, Inc. et al. v. Zurich American Insurance Co.

Hudson v. Michigan

IBP Inc. v. Alvarez and Tum v. Barber Foods, Inc.

Illinois Tool Works Inc., et al v. Independent Ink, Inc.

Jones v. Flowers et al.

Kansas v. Marsh

Kircher et al. v. Putnam Funds Trust, et al.

Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings v. Metabo-Lite Laboratories Inc. et al.

League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry

Lincoln Property Co. et al. v. Roche et ux.

Lockhart v. United States et al.

Marshall v. Marshall

Martin et ux v. Franklin Capital Corp.

Maryland v. Blake

Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Dabit

Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. Williams, et al.

Northern Insurance Company of New York v. Chatham County, Georgia

Oregon v. Guzek

Randall v. Sorrell

Rapanos v. United States

Rice et al. v. Collins

Rumsfeld et al. v. Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights Inc. et al.

Samson v. California

Sanchez-Llamas v. Oregon

Schaffer v. Weast

Scheidler et al. v. National Organization for Women Inc. et al. and
Operation Rescue v. National Organization for Women, Inc. et al.


S.D. Warren Co. v. Maine Board of Environmental Protection, et al.

Sereboff et ux. v. Mid Atlantic Medical Services, Inc.

Texaco Inc. v. Dagher et al. and
Shell Oil Co. v. Dagher et al.


United States v. Georgia et al.

United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez

United States v. Grubbs

United States v. Olson et al.

Unitherm Food Systems, Inc. v. Swift-Eckrich, Inc.

Volvo Trucks North America, Inc. v. Reeder-Simco GMC, Inc.

Wachovia Bank v. Schmidt, et al.

Wagnon v. Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation

Washington v. Recuenco

Whitman v. Department of Transportation et al.

Will et al. v. Hallock et al.

Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc. v. Federal Election Commission

Woodford et al. v. Ngo

Zedner v. United States

Advertisement