Monday, March 21

Davis v. United States, Docket No. 09-11328

Merit briefs

• Brief for Petitioner Willie Gene Davis
• Reply Brief for Petitioner Willie Gene Davis
• Brief of Respondent, United States of America

Amicus briefs

• Brief for Wayne County, Michigan in Support of Respondent
• Brief for the National Association of Federal Defenders in Support of Petitioner
• Brief of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation in Support of Respondent
• Brief for the States of Maryland, Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Idaho, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Maine, Michigan, Nebraska, Nevada, North Carolina, Nevada, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin, and Wyoming in Support of Respondent

Tolentino v. New York, Docket No. 09-11556

Merit briefs

• Brief for Petitioner Jose Toletino
• Brief of Respondent State of New York

Amicus briefs

• Brief for the Electronic Privacy Information Center in Support of Petitioner
• Brief for the United States of America in Support of Respondent
• Brief of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation in Support of Respondent
• Brief for the New York State Association of Chiefs of Police, Inc. and The New York State Sheriffs’ Association Institute, Inc. in Support of Respondent
• Brief for the States of Massachusetts, Alabama, Alaska, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, Idaho, Indiana, Louisiana, Maryland, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming in Support of Respondent

Tuesday, March 22

Duryea v. Guarnieri, Docket No. 09-1476

Merit briefs

• Brief for Petitioners Borough of Duryea, Pennsylvania, et al.
• Brief for Respondent Charles J. Guarnieri, Jr.
• Reply brief for Petitioner Borough of Duryea, Pennsylvania

Amicus briefs

• Brief for the States of Florida, Alabama, Colorado, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Louisiana, Maine, Michigan, Mississippi, New Jersey, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, West Virginia and Wyoming in Support of Petitioner
• Brief for the National School Boards Association in Support of Petitioner
• Brief for the United States of America in Support of Petitioner
• Brief for the State and Local Legal Center in Support of Petitioner
• Brief for the American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU of Pennsylvania in Support of Respondent
• Brief for the American Federation of Labor and the Congress of Industrial Organization in Support of Respondent
• Brief for the Justice and Freedom Fund in Support of Respondent
• Brief for the National Fraternal Order of Police, the National Troopers Coalition and the Pennsylvania Troopers Association in Support of Respondent

Fox v. Vice, Docket No. 10-114

Merit briefs

• Brief for Petitioner Ricky D. Fox
• Reply brief for Petitioner Ricky D. Fox
• Brief for Respondent, Billy Ray Vice, Chief of Police for the Town of Vinton, and the Town of Vinton
• Declaration of Joshua Rosenkranz in Support of Letter Brief

Amicus briefs

• Brief for the Liberty Institute, CATO Institute, the Independence Law Center, Institute for Justice Texas Chapter, and the James Madison Center for Free Speech in Support of Petitioner
• Brief for American Civil Liberties Union, Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Impact Fund, Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, the Legal Aid Society of New York City, the National Employment Lawyers Association, New York, the National Fair Housing Alliance, People for the American Way Foundation, and Public Justice in Support of Petitioner
• Brief for Arkansas, Alabama, Colorado, Delaware, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Louisiana, Maine, Mississippi, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, and Wyoming in Support of Respondent
• Brief of the National Conference of State Legislatures, the National League of Cities, the National Association of Counties, the International City/County Management Association, the United States Conference of Mayors, and the International Municipal Lawyers Association in Support of Respondent

Wednesday, March 23

Turner v. Rogers, Docket No. 10-10

Merit briefs

• Brief for Petitioner Michael D. Turner
• Reply Brief of Petitioner, Michael D. Turner
• Brief of Respondent Rebecca Rogers and Larry E. Price, Sr.

Amicus briefs

• Brief for the American Bar Association in Support of Petitioner
• Brief for the Constitution Project in Support of Petitioner
• Brief for Elizabeth G. Patterson and the South Carolina Appleseed Legal Justice Center in Support of Petitioner
• Brief for the Center for Family Policy and Practice in Support of Petitioner
• Brief for the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, the Brennan Center for Justice, the National Legal Aid & Defender Association, the Southern Center for Human Rights, And the American Civil Liberties Union in Support of Petitioner
• Brief for the Legal Aid Society of the District of Columbia, the Children’s Law Center, DC Appleseed Center for Law and Justice, and the National Law Center on Homelessness & Poverty in Support of Petitioner
• Brief for the United States of America in Support of Reversal
• Brief of Senators Demint, Graham, Johanns and Rubio in Support of Respondents
• Brief of Texas, Alabama, Arizona, Mississippi, New Hampshire, South Carolina, Utah, Virginia, and Wyoming in Support of Respondent
• Brief for Law Professors Benjamin Barton and Darryl Brown in Support of Respondent
•  

J.D.B., v. North Carolina, Docket No. 09-11121

Merit briefs

• Brief for Petitioner J.B.D.
• Reply Brief of Petitioner, J.D.B.
• Brief for Respondent North Carolina

Amicus briefs

• Brief for Center on Wrongful Convictions of Youth, et al., in Support of Petitioner
• Brief for Juvenile Law Center, et al. in Support of Petitioner
• Brief for the American Civil Liberties Union in Support of Petitioner
• Brief for the American Bar Association in Support of Petitioner
• Brief for the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers in Support of Petitioner
• Brief for the United States of American in Support of Respondent
• Brief of Indiana, Alabama, Arkansas, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Guam, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois,
  Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Michigan, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Puerto
  Rico, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, and Wyoming in Support of Respondent
• Brief of the National District Attorney’s Association in Support of Respondent

Monday, March 28

Arizona Free Enterprise v. Bennett Docket No. 10-238
and
McComish v. Bennett Docket No. 10-239
(consolidated)

Merit briefs

• Brief for Petitioner John McComish, Nancy McCain, and Tony Bouie (in 10-239 only)
• Brief for Petitioner Arizona Free Enterprise Club's Freedom Club Pac, et al.( in 09-238 only)
• Reply Brief for Petitioner Arizona Free Enterprise Club’s Freedom Club PAC, et al.
• Reply Brief for Petitioner John McComish, Nancy McCain, and Tony Bouie (in 10-239 only)
• Brief of State Respondents

Amicus briefs

• Brief for the Yankee Institute for Public Policy in Support of Petitioner
• Brief for the Justice and Freedom Fund in Support of Petitioner
• Brief for the Center for Competitive Politics in Support of Petitioner
• Brief for Gun Owners of America, Inc., Gun Owners Foundation, Citizens United, Citizens United Foundation, U.S. Justice Foundation, Arizona State Chapter of the Association of Physicians and Surgeons, Institute on the Constitution, DownsizeDC.org, Inc., Downsize DC Foundation, Campaign for Liberty, Conservative Legal Defense and Education Fund, Policy Analysis Center, the Lincoln Institute for Research and Education, Constitution Party National Committee, and Public Advocate of the United States in Support of Petitioners
• Brief of the Clean Elections Institute, Inc., in Support of Respondents
• Brief for Former Officials of the American Civil Liberties Union in Support of Respondent
• Brief for the CATO Institution in Support of Petitioner
• Brief for Four Former Chairmen and One Former Commissioner for the Federal Election Commission in Support of Petitioner
• Brief for Mitch McConnell, United States Senator in Support of Petitioner
• Brief for the Wyoming Liberty Group in Support of Petitioner (in 10-239 only)
• Brief for the United States in Support of Respondent
• Brief for the Center for Government Studies in Support of Respondent
• Brief for Anthony Corrado, Thomas Mann, and Norman Ornstein in Support of Respondent
• Brief for Constitutional Scholars in Support of Respondent
• Brief for the for Reform Judaism in Support of Respondent
• Self-Financing Candidates Congressman Bill Foster (Ret.), Congressman Alan Grayson (Ret.), Congressman Steve Kagen (Ret.), Governor Angus King (Ret.), Ned Lamont, Congressman Walt Minnick (Ret.), Congressman Jared Polis, and Congressman John Yarmuth in Support of Respondent
• Brief of Former Elected Officials in Support of Respondent
• Brief for Professors of Constitutional and Election Law in Support of Respondents
• Brief of Service Employees International Union in Support of Respondent
• Brief for Maine Citizens for Clean Elections, Lawrence Bliss, Pamela Jabar Trinward, Andrew O’Brien, and David Van Wie in Support of Respondent
• Brief for Costas Panagopoulos, Ph.D., Ryan D. Enos, Ph.D., Conor M. Dowling, Ph.D. and Anthony Fowler in Support of Respondent
• Brief for Justice at Stake, 13 Former Chief Justice and Justices, and One Former Trial Judge in Support of Respondents (in 10-239 only)
• Brief for the Campaign Legal Center, Democracy 21, the League of Women
  Voters of the United States, League Of Women Voters of Arizona, Public Citizen, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, the New Jersey Appleseed Public Interest Law Center and the Sierra Club in Support of Respondent
• Brief for the Committee for Economic Development in Support of Respondents
• Brief of the States of Iowa, Connecticut, Maryland, New Mexico, and Vermont in Support of Respondent
• Municipal Brief for Respondents

CSX Transportation v. McBride, Docket No. 10-235

Merit briefs

• Brief of Petitioner CSX Transportation
• Brief for Respondent Robert McBride
• Reply Brief of Petitioner CSX Transportation

Amicus briefs

• Brief for the Association of American Railroads in Support of Petitioner
• Brief for the American Train Dispatchers Association, Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen, Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees Division, the Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen, the International Brotherhood of Boilermakers & Blacksmiths, the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, the National Conference of Firemen & Oilers District of Local 32 BJ, SEIU, the Sheet Metal Workers International Association, Transport Workers Union of America, the Transportation Communications International Union and the United Transportation Union in Support of Respondent
• Brief for Cheryl Campagno, Daniel D. Hill, and Frances K. Jennings in Support of Respondent
• Brief for the Academy of Rail Labor Attorneys in Support of Respondents
• Brief for the American Association for Justice in Support of Respondent

Tuesday, March 29

Wal-Mart Stores v. Dukes, Docket No. 10-277

Merit briefs

• Brief for Petitioner Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.,
• Brief of Respondent Betty Dukes
• Reply Brief for Petitioner Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.,

Amicus briefs

• Brief for the Equal Employment Advisory Council in Support of Petitioner
• Brief of DRI—The Voice of the Defense Bar in Support Petitioner
• Brief for Atlantic Legal Foundation and New England Legal Foundation in Support of Petitioner
• Brief of the Washington Legal Foundation in Support of Petitioner
• Brief of the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America in Support of Petitioner
• Brief of the Society for Human Resource Management and HR Policy Association in Support of Petitioner
• Brief for Altria Group, Inc., Bank Of America Corporation, Cigna Corporation, Del Monte Foods Company, Dole Food Company, Inc., Dollar General Corporation, Dupont Company, Fedex Corporation, General Electric Company, Hewlett-Packard
  Company, Kimberly-Clark Corporation, McKesson Corporation, Microsoft Corporation, NYSE Euronext, Pepsico, Inc., Tyson Foods, Inc., UnitedHealth Group Incorporated, United Parcel Service, Inc., Walgreen Co., And The Williams Companies, Inc., in Support of Petitioner
• Brief of the California Employment Law Council in Support of Petitioner
• Brief of Costco Wholesale Corporation in Support of Petitioner
• Brief of the International Association of Defense Council in Support of Petitioner
• Brief of the Retail Litigation Center, Inc., in Support of Petitioner
• Brief of the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association in Support of Petitioner
• Brief of the Intel Corporation in Support of Petitioner
• Brief for the Pacific Legal Foundation in Support of Petitioner
• Brief for the Association of Global Automakers, Inc. in Support of Petitioner
• Brief for the Equal Employment Advisory Council in Support of Petitioner
• Brief for the U.S. Women’s Chamber of Commerce, the National Partnership for Women & Families, and the California Women’s Lawyers in Support of Respondent
• Brief for Labor Economists and Statisticians in Support of Respondent
• Brief of Law and Economic Professors in Support of Respondent
• Brief for the Institute for Women’s Policy Research in Support of Respondent
• Brief of the National Employment Law Association, the Equal Justice Society, and the Legal Aid Society-Employment Law Center in Support of Respondent
• Brief of Public Citizen in Support of Respondents
• Brief for the American Sociological Association and the Law and Society Association in Support of Respondent
• Brief for the United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations and Change in Support of Respondents
• Brief for Public Justice, P.C., the National Association of Consumer Advocates and the National Consumers League in Support of Respondents
• Brief for Civil Procedure Professors in Support of Respondents
• Brief for NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc., National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, AARP, Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund, Inc., Latino Justice PRLDEF, Asian American Justice Center, Asian Law Caucus, and Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law in Support of Respondents
• Brief for the American Civil Liberties Union and National Women’s Law Center in Support of Respondent
• Brief of the American Association for Justice in Support of Respondent

Fowler v. United States, Docket No. 10-5443

Merit briefs

• Brief for Petitioner Charles Fowler
• Brief for Respondent United States of America
• Reply Brief for Petitioner Charles Fowler

Amicus briefs

• Coming soon!

Wednesday, March 30

Plivia, Inc., v. Mensing Docket No. 09-993
and
Actavis Elizabeth, LLC v. Mensing Docket No. 09-1039
and
Actavis, Inc., v. Demahy Docket No. 09-1501
(consolidated)

Merit Briefs

• Brief for Petitioners Actavis Inc. and Actavis Elizabeth LLC
• Brief for Petitioner Actavis Elizabeth, LLC and Actavis, Inc. (in 09-1039 and 09-1501 only)
• Brief for Respondent Gladys Mensing and Julie Demahy
• Reply Brief for Petitioner Actavis, Inc., and Actavis Elizabeth LLC  (in 09-1039 and 09-1501 only)
• Brief for Petitioners Pliva, Inc.; Teva Pharms. Usa, Inc.; and UDL Labs, Inc.
• Reply Brief for Petitioner Plivia, Inc, Teva Pharms, USA, Inc., and UDL Labs, Inc., (in 09-993 only)

Amicus Briefs

• Brief for Morton Grove Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Impax Laboratories, Inc. in Support of Petitioners
• Brief for the United States in Support of Respondents
• Brief for the American Association for Justice in Support of Respondent
• Brief for the National Conference of State Legislators in Support of Respondent
• Brief for States of Minnesota, Louisiana, Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming, and the District of Columbia in Support of Respondent
• Brief for Torts Professors Mary J. Davis, Heidi Li Feldman, Thomas C. Galligan, Jr., Mark P. Gergen, and Jon Hanson in Support of Respondent
• Brief for Dr. Christy Graves in Support of Respondent
• Brief for the National Coalition Against Censorship in Support of Respondent
• Brief for the American Medical Association, Texas Medical Association, Texas Medical Liability Trust, Texas Alliance for Patient Access, North Carolina Medical Society, California Medical Association, Louisiana Medical Mutual Insurance Company, and Louisiana State Medical Society in Support of Respondent
• Brief for Marc T. Law, John Abramson, Julie Donohue, Michael Fischer, and Meredith Rosenthal in Support of Respondent
• Brief for Administrative Law and Civil Procedure Scholars in Support of Respondent
• Brief for the Generic Pharmaceutical Association in Support of Petitioner
• Brief for Constitutional Accountability Center in Support of Respondent
• Brief for Rep. Henry A. Waxman in Support of Respondents Urging Affirmance
• Brief for Jerome P. Kassiner, M.D., and Paul D. Stolley, M.D., M.P.H., in Support of Respondents

Talk America, Inc., v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co., Docket No. 10-313
and
Isiogu, v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co., Docket No. 10-329
(consilodated)

Merit briefs

• Brief for Petitioner Talk America (in 10-313 only)
• Brief for Petitioner Orjiakor N. Isiogu, Monica Martinez, and Greg R. White, Commissioners of the Michigan Public Service Commission (in 10-329 only)
• Brief for Respondent Michigan Bell Telephone Company
• Reply Brief for Petitioner Talk America, Inc. (in 10-313 only)
• Reply Brief for Petitioner Orjaikor N. Isiogu, Monica Martinez, and Greg R. White, Commissioners of the Michigan Public Service Commission (in 10-329 only)

Amicus briefs

• Brief for Comptel in Support of Petitioners
• Brief for the United States in Support of Petitioners
• Brief for Centurylink, Qwest Communications International, and Windstream Corporation in Support of  Respondent
• Brief for Verizon in Support of Respondent
• Brief for United States Telecom Association and Network Engineers in Support of Respondent
• Brief for Administrative Law Professors in Support of Respondent
• Brief for the California Public Utilities Commission in Support of Petitioner
• Brief for Sprint Nextel Corporation in Support of Petitioner