Questions Presented
Whether the warrantless use of a tracking device on respondent's vehicle to monitor its movements on public streets violated the Fourth Amendment.
10-1259
United States v. Jones
Docket No., 10-1259
Argument Date: Tuesday, November 8, 2011
Merit Briefs
- Brief of Petitioner United States of America
- Brief of Respondent Antoine Jones
- Reply Brief of Petitioner United States of America
Amicus Briefs
- Brief for the Cato Institute in Support of Respondent
- Brief for the Center for Democracy & Technology, Electronic Frontier Foundation, Matt Blaze, Andrew J. Blumberg, Roger L. Easton, and Norman Sadeh in Support of Respondent
- Brief for the Center on the Administration of Criminal Law in Support of Petitioner
- Brief for the American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU of the Nation's Capital in Support of Respondent
- Brief for the Constitution Project in Support of Respondent
- Brief for the Council on American-Islamic Relations in Support of Respondent
- Brief for the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) and Legal Scholars and Technical Experts in Support of Respondent
- Brief for Gun Owners of America, Inc., Gun Owners Justice Foundation, Institute On The Constitution, Center for Media and Democracy, Free Speech Coalition, Inc., Free Speech Defense and Education Fund, Inc., Downsizedc.Org, Downsize DC Foundation, Conservative Legal Defense and Education Fund, Declaration Alliance, Restoring Liberty Action Committee, the Lincoln Institute for Research and Education, Policy Analysis Center, Constitution Party National Committee, and the Libertarian National Committee, Inc., in Support of Respondent
- Brief for the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law, the First Amendment Lawyers Association, the District of Columbia Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, the New York State Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, and the Ohio Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers in Support of Respondent
- Brief for Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association, Inc. in Support of Respondent
- Brief for the Rutherford Institute and the National Motorist Association in Support of Respondent
- Brief for Yale Law School Information Society Project Scholars and Other Experts in the Law of Privacy and Technology in Support of the Respondent
