- ABA Groups
- Resources for Lawyers
- Career Center
- About Us
Matthew R. Jones is a partner at the firm of EIP in London, where he specializes in multijurisdictional patent litigation in Europe. The author would like to thank Gabriel Cuonzo and his colleagues at the firm of Trevisan & Cuonzo, and Benjamin Grzimek of EIP, for invaluable assistance and useful discussions in the course of preparing this article.
As an opening strategy in patent litigation, the “Italian torpedo” is one of the most interesting and creative. It arose out of the peculiarities of the rules governing jurisdiction between European Union member states (and, of course, out of the minds of diligent and creative lawyers), and became one of the most controversial tactics used by alleged patent infringers in Europe. It was also something of a headache for patentees and the practitioners representing them. For many years, most practitioners thought that the Italian courts and the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) had “killed” the Italian torpedo. However, in a 2013 judgment, the Italian Supreme Court revived the Italian torpedo. This article discusses what the Italian torpedo is, how it died, how it caused a little trouble even after its death, how it came back with a vengeance, and what patentees might do to defend against it.