LAW PRACTICE MANAGEMENT: Engagement Letters: Beginning a Beautiful Relationship

Vol. 31 No. 1

By

Marian C. Rice (mrice@lbcclaw.com) is chair of the Attorney Liability Practice Group at the New York law firm of L’Abbate Balkan Colavita & Contini LLP.

The ABA Standing Committee on Lawyers’ Professional Liability recently released data on a cross section of legal malpractice claims from 2008 to 2011, reporting that nearly 16 percent of all claims had been caused by poor client communications. To avoid such an outcome, lawyers should start their relationship with a client by having a full and frank discussion about the goals and terms of the engagement and the responsibilities of both the attorney and the client. Shortly after, the oral agreement needs to be accurately committed to paper.

Many jurisdictions mandate the content of written engagement letters in certain situations, and lawyers must consult the local rules before settling on the form of engagement letter to use as a guide. The ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct “prefer” written engagement letters but require written agreements only where a contingency fee is permitted (Rule 1.5(c)) or where the fee charged may be considered entering into a business transaction with a client (Rule 1.8(a)). Even where a jurisdiction does not mandate the use of a written engagement letter, however, maintenance of office procedures requiring that all engagements be reduced to writing is a sound risk management policy and promotes compliance with the Model Rules.

Identify the client. As an initial matter, the engagement letter should identify the client whose interests are being represented. Equally as important is a definition of those whose interests are not being represented. In representing a business organization, particular care should be taken to explain to the constituents of the organization that the organization is the attorney’s client where the interests of the organization may not be aligned with those of the constituents. Engagement letters in the trust and estates field should also clearly identify the attorney’s client in order to avoid the common misconception by relatives of the client that the attorney is the “family” lawyer.

Scope of engagement. Making the scope of the work performed under the terms of an engagement letter as broad as possible is a natural reaction. As outlined in Model Rule 1.2(c), it is perfectly acceptable for a lawyer to reasonably limit the terms of the engagement, provided the client is aware of the limitations and gives his or her informed consent.

A plainly worded provision setting forth the defined scope of the services to be performed is one of the most important risk management tools an attorney can adopt. If the intended engagement does not include appeals, the engagement letter should say so. If the attorney represents the executor but an accounting professional is separately retained by the estate to prepare the estate tax returns, spell it out in the engagement letter. If the ongoing representation expands beyond its original scope, a simple amendment to the original agreement will suffice. It is a sensible idea to set forth in this section of the letter the allocation of responsibility between the attorney and client in order to apprise the client of his or her role in the success of the representation.

Terms of payment. The engagement letter must also set forth the monetary terms of payment and should include the frequency of payment, the definition of the expenses for which the client will be responsible, and a realistic outline of the steps involved in the course of the representation, together with the time frame within which the client may expect to know the outcome of the retention. An estimated budget of the cost of the representation—subject, of course, to revision as the matter proceeds and unanticipated events occur—will go a long way toward avoiding the misunderstandings that can cause a breakdown in the attorney-client relationship. If an attorney is concerned that a client will not retain the attorney if a realistic cost estimate is provided up front, the attorney should know that the client is never going to be happy with the services rendered as fees mount beyond the client’s expectations.

If it is anticipated that the compensation spelled out in the engagement letter will change during the representation, the attorney should advise the client in the engagement letter of the circumstances warranting any increase in fees and the parameters of any projected change. In addition to the fact that Rule 1.5 states that “[a]ny changes in the basis or rate of the fee or expenses shall also be communicated to the client,” many jurisdictions will exercise a high degree of scrutiny to changes in the terms of compensation that are not detailed in an engagement letter, particularly where the changes inure solely to the benefit of the attorney.

Additional factors that may negate the ability to change the terms of compensation include the sophistication of the client and the timing of the requested change. Rule 1.5(a) provides that an attorney may not charge “unreasonable” fees or expenses. The key to the reasonableness of the fees provided for in the letter is the client’s understanding of the amounts charged and the reasons for the fee structure.

The engagement letter should also spell out the consequences of the failure to pay in a timely manner the legal fees invoiced to the client. The tolerance a law firm may have for unpaid invoices may differ from client to client, but keeping track of troublesome accounts receivable and taking appropriate action if requests for payment are ignored are important functions of law firm management. Suits for unpaid legal fees will provoke retaliatory claims of malpractice. While the ability of a law firm to extricate itself from an engagement may depend on the jurisdiction and the nature of the representation, the client should be informed that nonpayment will result in withdrawal. Many jurisdictions require attorneys to advise their clients in the engagement letter of the existence of attorney-client fee dispute and conciliation programs.

Client communications. The frequency and means by which the attorney will apprise the client of the status of the proceedings should also be outlined in the engagement letter. Model Rule 1.4 requires that the client be kept reasonably informed of the status of the matter. While e-mail has become a common means of communication, attorneys must caution their clients that no attorney-client privilege will attach to substantive attorney-client communications made under circumstances where there is a significant risk that the communications will be read by a third party.

Also, if it is apparent that an actual or potential conflict of interest exists, the manner in which the conflict is being addressed should be set forth in the engagement letter. Keep in mind that not every conflict can be waived and that the consequences of failing to adequately analyze a conflict can be devastating to both the client and the law firm. Assuming the existence of a conflict, the client’s informed consent must be obtained for any waiver to be effective.

Document and file retention. Given the obligation imposed on attorneys to take affirmative steps to ensure a litigation hold is in place and that data is preserved from the moment it becomes reasonably evident a dispute exists, reference to the client’s role in the preservation obligation should be spelled out on engagement. Although the details of the client’s obligations should be outlined in a separate document, a cursory reference to the need for the client to safeguard data and cease routine document destruction policies is warranted.

ABA Law Practice Division

This article is an abridged and edited version of one that originally appeared on page 14 of Law Practice, May/June 2013 (39:3).

For more information or to obtain a copy of the periodical in which the full article appears, please call the ABA Service Center at 800/285-2221.

Website: lawpractice.org

Periodicals: Members-only Law Practice (bimonthly magazine) and LawPractice. news (monthly e-newsletter); Law Practice Today (monthly webzine) posted on the Division website and open to non-members.

CLE and Other Programs: The Division annually provides more than 100 educational programs, including live CLE sessions, webinars, and teleconferences.

Books and Other Recent Publications: More than 125 titles in print, including iPad in One Hour for Lawyers, 2d ed.; Social Media as Evidence; How to Start and Build a Law Practice, 5th ed.; Adobe Acrobat in One Hour for Lawyers; LinkedIn in One Hour for Lawyers, 2d ed.; The Lawyer’s Guide to Microsoft Outlook 2013.

Advertisement

  • About GPSolo magazine

  • Subscriptions

  • More Information

  • Contact Us