Family Law Quarterly
Volume 46, No. 3 (Fall 2012)

Symposium on Uniform Premarital and Marital Agreements  

Table of Contents

Please note that pursuant to the ABA's copyright and reprint policies, these articles may not be disseminated without written permission.

Editor's Note
Linda D. Elrod


A New Uniform Law for Premarital and Marital Agreements
Barbara A. Atwood & Brian H. Bix

This article introduces the new Uniform Premarital and Marital Agreements Act, approved by the Uniform Law Commission in July 2012.  Coauthored by the Drafting Committee Chair and the Reporter for the Act, the article explains the impetus for the drafting project, the policy debates that the project engendered, and the ongoing tension between practical enactability and ideal enforcement standards.  In response to the widespread criticism of the existing Uniform Premarital Agreement Act, the new Act significantly strengthens the requirements of procedural fairness to ensure voluntary and informed consent.  In addition, the Act covers marital agreements—agreements entered into between spouses intending to remain married—and thus provides a needed legal framework in an area of considerable uncertainty.  In discussing the intended application of the Act's key provisions, the article highlights the ways in which it marks a significant reform for the law of marital contracting. 

Read article



Uniform Premarital and Marital Agreements Act 

The Uniform Premarital and Marital Agreements Act with Reporter’s Comments, as approved by the Uniform Law Commission in July 2012, is reprinted here with permission.

Read UPMAA




Would Enactment of the Uniform Premarital and Marital Agreements Act in All Fifty States Change U.S. Law Regarding Premarital Agreements?
J. Thomas Oldham

This article summarizes the provisions of the Uniform Premarital and Marital Agreements Act, promulgated by the Uniform Law Commission in the summer of 2012.  It compares these provisions to the Uniform Premarital Agreement Act, the rules currently applicable in states that did not adopt the UPAA, and the approach applied in other countries to premarital agreements contemplating divorce.  The article summarizes the new requirement in the UPMAA that, to be enforceable, each party must have had "access to independent counsel," and discusses how courts might construe such a provision.

Read article



Book Review: The Perils and Pitfalls of Marital Agreements in Multiple Legal Systems
Robert E. Rains

Marital Agreements and Private Autonomy in Comparative Perspective (Jens M. Scherpe, ed.)


The author reviews Marital Agreements and Private Autonomy in Comparative Perspective, Jens M. Scherpe, editor. The book is a British-academy funded research project that arose out of a 2009 conference in Cambridge, England. The project examines fourteen nations’ (mostly European) approaches to the question of how and to what extent couples may opt out of default systems for property ownership and distribution, as well as different forms of post-separation maintenance. The reviewer concludes, as editor Scherpe does, that "cast-iron" agreements do not really exist in any of the jurisdictions examined. The reviewer finds the book’s analysis thorough and fascinating. He believes that this book is an excellent first step, but that researchers must now move on to analyze results in South and Central America, Africa, and Asia.

Read review



2012 Schwab Essay Contest Winners

You Say Adoption, I Say Objection: Why the Word War Over Embryo Disposition Is More Than Just Semantics
Jessica R. Hoffman

This article focuses on the disposition of excess embryos that result from Assisted Reproductive Technologies. Part I examines the patchwork of existing laws created in reaction to disputes concerning embryo disposition. Part II discusses the two leading models proposed to govern embryo disposition and which body of law should govern. Part III suggests taking the best and most applicable aspects of both models to create a system of rights and repeatable procedures to govern embryo disposition today and in the future as new medical advancements occur.

Read article



Hello Mommy and Daddy, How in the World Did They Let You Become My Parents?
Georgia Gebhardt

This article examines current flaws in the international adoption process. The author explains the current process parents typically encounter when adopting internationally, and describes the existing body of law that governs international adoptions. She explores the screening criteria used to select parents for adoption, along with the post-placement reporting requirements of countries that have agreed to abide by the Hague Adoption Convention. She compares the practices of countries that have adopted the Convention with those that have not, and asks whether international law has created safer adoptions and better screening of prospective parents. She concludes with four suggested changes to international law to better ensure uniform standards in selecting prospective adoptive parents and monitoring a child’s post-adoption well being.

Read article



A Comparison of Japanese and Moroccan Approaches in Adopting the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction
Michelle Boykin

This article focuses on the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction and analyzes Japan's internal legal structure and efforts made to join the Hague Convention. The article then compares Japan to Morocco, examining the reforms Morocco made to its family law system in order to join the Hague Abduction Convention. The article concludes with several recommendations to help Japan make reforms and transition to become a signatory of the Hague Abduction Convention.

Read article


Publication Date: January 2013

 

 

Ordering Information

You can purchase a hard copy or downloadable pdf of this issue through the ABA Web Store. To order hard copy by phone, call the ABA Service Center at 1-800-285-2221 and request PC 51301004603.

 

Please Note:

The materials in the Quarterly represent the opinions of the authors and shall not be construed to be the action of the American Bar Association or the Section of Family Law unless adopted pursuant to the bylaws of the association and the section.

 

Advertisement

FLQ News

Ready-made CLE at a Discount!
FLQ provides substantive material for use in your CLE presentations. When you purchase recent issues of FLQ for your CLE programming, you not only get analysis of topical family law issues, you also get great bulk discounts! For more information, contact Debby Eisel.

Purchase Recent FLQ Issues Online
You can now purchase recent issues online through the ABA Web Store. If you're perusing (recent) archived issues, just look for the Ordering Information box at the bottom of the page.

Need to purchase in bulk? We offer great discount rates! And remember, you can always order issues by calling the ABA Service Center at 1-800-285-2221.


Board of Editors


Editor in Chief
Linda D. Elrod


Associate Editor
Robert G. Spector


Board of Editors
Jeff Atkinson
Jean N. Crowe
John DeWitt Gregory
Robert J. Levy
J. Thomas Oldham
John J. Sampson
Samuel V. Schoonmaker, IV
Nancy Ver Steegh


Reviewing Editors
Susan Appleton
Patricia M. Hoff
Harry D. Krause
Paul M. Kurtz
Dr. Milfred D. Dale


Managing Editor
Deborah Eisel


2011-2012 Student Editorial Staff
Washburn University School of Law


Student Editor-In-Chief
Ellen J. Grennier


Student Executive Research Editors
Benjamin T. Hinkle
Anna M. Jumpponen


Student Senior Editor
Leah N. Bockover


Student Junior Editors
Travis L. Cook
A. Kelsey DeLong
Annalee J. Foster
Hazel L. Gauthier
Eileen D. Ma
Chandler L. Maxon
Matthew C. McGregor
Justin J. Pierson
Laura E. Poschen
Stephanie A. Randall
Ginger E. Wells



Staff Assistants
Penny R. Fell
Shirley Jacobson