Family Law Quarterly Home

A scholarly journal designed to keep practitioners current with an analytical view of existing and emerging family law issues, Family Law Quarterly will keep you informed on the year's hot topics, including "Family Law in the Fifty States: Case Digests" and "A Review of the Year in Family Law." A subscription to FLQ is included with your Family Law Section membership. For more information about FLQ, use the links provided at the right or check out the current volume below.

Family Law Section members can read articles online as PDFs! The table of contents for the latest volume of the Quarterly is below, along with links to pdfs of the articles. Non-member subscribers and non-subscribers may read abstracts of the articles. (Archives of article abstracts are available for volumes dating back to 2001.)


Family Law Quarterly
Volume 49, No. 2 (Summer


Symposium on Jurisdictional Issues and Family Law

Table of Contents

Please note that pursuant to the ABA's copyright and reprint policies, these articles may not be disseminated without written permission.

Integrating UIFSA (2008) with the Hague Convention of 23 November 2007 on the International Recovery of Child Support and Other Forms of Family Maintenance

John J. Sampson & Barry J. Brooks

The prefatory note and comments to the uniform law present a brief history of the four versions of the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act (UIFSA), and include amendments approved by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws in July 2008. The focus is on the current version (2008), which amends UIFSA (1996) and (2001), the two versions of the act in most common effect in the United States. Additional footnotes and unofficial annotations are included to assist in further understanding of the present act and the pending international treaty for international enforcement of family support.

Read article

"Reconciling" FFCCSOA and UIFSA

Margaret Campbell Haynes & Susan Friedman Paikin

In 2014, Congress passed the Preventing Sex Trafficking and Strengthening Families Act. The legislation included a requirement that all states enact the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act (UIFSA) 2008 as a condition of receiving federal Title IV-D child support funds. The 2014 federal legislation also amended the Full Faith and Credit of Child Support Orders Act (FFCCSOA). The Uniform Law Commission first developed UIFSA in 1992. Congress first enacted FFCCSOA in 1994. Although the intent was for the two acts to always include similar provisions, Congressional amendments to FFCCSOA have lagged behind amendments by the Uniform Law Commission to UIFSA. Although the 2014 amendments made certain provisions of FFCCSOA more closely follow the language of UIFSA, gaps remain. This article discusses the evolution of UIFSA and FFCCSOA. The authors identify additional needed amendments to FFCCSOA in order to avoid case law erroneously concluding there is a federal preemption of UIFSA. 

Read article

Why a New Uniform Equitable Distribution Jurisdiction Act Is Needed to Reduce Forum Shopping in Divorce Litigation

J. Thomas Oldham    

In the United States, when married parents with a minor child divorce, the most significant issues commonly pertain to (i) custody, (ii) support, and (iii) property division. Rules governing when a U.S. divorce court may assert jurisdiction over these issues in a family law case are not uniform. The lack of a sensible system of jurisdictional priority for support and property division can lead to forum shopping and a race to the courthouse. In addition, this lack of a uniform system can lead to different issues being heard in courts in different states, which can be expensive and inconvenient for the parties,

This article proposes a more coherent set of rules for priority of jurisdiction in U. S. family law matters.  The author builds on the already accepted principle of “home state” as it is now applied for custody matters.  He proposes that if parties are divorcing with a minor child, and the child has a home state, that home state court should presumptively hear all matters in the divorce.  If parties do not have a minor child, a court in the state where the parties last had a common domicile for at least six months should presumptively adjudicate the economic aspects of the divorce.             

Read article


Publication Date: September 2015

Ordering Information

You can purchase a hard copy or downloadable pdf of this issue through the ABA Web Store. To order hard copy by phone, call the ABA Service Center at 1-800-285-2221 and request PC 51301004703.