Moot Court Competition

First Amendment and Media Law Diversity Moot Court Competition Presented by the ABA Forum on Communications Law

 

2014-15 Moot Court Flyer

 

Congratulations to the 2014 Moot Court Competition winners!

Winning Team:  Sara Loop Bell and Yvette Butler
Best Oralist:  Catherine Song
Best Brief:  Sara Loop Bell and Yvette Butler

Semi-finalists Sara Bell and Yvette Butler,
George Washington University School of Law 2014
and Grace Aviles and Catherine Song,
Fordham University School of Law 2014

This annual competition, now in its seventh year, is designed to introduce minority law students to the practice of media law and to many of the lawyers who are active in the media law bar.

Click here for the application form. There is no fee to apply or participate! Register by Monday, April 14, 2014 for the priority deadline (explained below).  The final deadline is Friday, May 30, 2014.

Click here for the Moot Court Rules.

COMPETITION BASICS

The moot court Hypothetical Case involves timely issues of national significance in the field of media law. Past competitions have included issues relating to, for instance, the tort of “hot news” misappropriation and the potential liability of “news aggregators” who republish information gathered by traditional news media outlets, subpoenas designed to “unmask” anonymous website contributors. Last year’s topic involved whether or not the public and the press have a qualified First Amendment right of access to attend an internal employee disciplinary proceeding at a public university.

Law students interested in the competition submit short written applications and a short essay on a media law question posed in the application. From the application submissions, up to eight teams (“quarter-finalists”) are selected to submit an appeal brief. Each quarter-finalist will be paired with a practicing media law attorney in a city close to their law school for career advice, mentoring and networking.  Last year’s quarter-finalists were mentored by attorneys such as Stephanie Abrutyn, in-house counsel for HBO in New York; Chip Babcock, a partner with Jackson Walker LLP in Houston, Texas; Laura Prather, a partner with Haynes and Boone in Austin, Texas; Chuck Tobin, a partner with Holland & Knight in Washington,D.C.; to name a few. Each quarter-finalist also will receive complimentary registration to attend (and all meals during) the Forum’s 20th Annual Conference in Scottsdale, Arizona, which will be held from February 5-7, 2015.  (Transportation to the Annual Conference and hotel are not provided for quarter-finalists.) 

“I loved having the mentors. Please please please please continue this! Having my mentor, Chip Babcock, was a huge help in calming my nerves and preparing me for the competition. Chip and my partner's mentor, John Edwards, were incredibly gracious to allow us to come to their offices and to take time from their busy schedules to help us practice. I enjoyed talking to Chip both about the competition and about my legal and non-legal interests. I hope that you continue this program because it was a highlight of the competition for me.”

Carolyn Ng, Thurgood Marshall School of Law, 2013-14 Competition

The four teams with the highest brief scores will receive coaching from their mentors to prepare for oral arguments.  The four teams will compete in the semi-final round of oral arguments during the Forum’s Annual Conference.  (In addition to complimentary registration to attend the Forum’s Annual Conference, all semi-finalists also will receive round trip transportation and four night’s hotel stay during the Annual Conference.)  The two teams with the highest combined brief and semi-final oral argument scores will compete in the final round of oral arguments during the Annual Conference before a panel of sitting appellate judges.

Prizes are awarded to the team with the highest-scoring brief, as well as to the team that wins the final round of oral arguments and to the student with the highest oral argument score in the final round of arguments. All students who attend the Annual Conference will have the opportunity to network with practicing media law attorneys from across the country and attend engaging and informative panels.

“Participating in the ABA First Amendment and Media Law Diversity Moot Court Competition has been one of the best experiences we have had in law school. Through the competition, we had the opportunity to enhance our legal research and brief writing skills, and learn more about the dynamic field of media and communications law. Furthermore, we were able to practice our oral advocacy skills in front of a distinguished panel of judges and practitioners. Participating in the Competition was an opportunity of a lifetime, and one that we will never forget.”

Sarmili Saha, Fordham Law 2011 & Elba L. Bermudez, Fordham Law 2012

APPLICATIONS, BRIEFING, ORAL ARGUMENT

Students from any ABA-accredited law school are encouraged to apply to participate in the competition. Students must be members of a chapter of the National Black Law Students Association; the National Latino/a Law Student Association; the National Asian Pacific American Law Student Association; the National Native American Law Students Association; or a comparable minority law student organization at their school.

To apply, each student must submit a resume; a short (pre-existing) writing sample; and a response to a short essay hypothetical on a media-related topic. A short registration form also must be completed; one for each team or individual student applying. There is no fee to apply. The Competition Committee will partner students who enter individually and are selected to advance to the quarter-final round. Students applying on or before the priority deadline will be notified by Friday, April 25, 2014 if the student has been selected to advance to the quarter-final round.  If a student does not receive such a notification, the student will remain eligible for consideration with the applicants who apply on or before the final application deadline.  All students will be notified of whether they advance to the quarter-final round on or before June 16, 2014.

The Competition Committee will select up to eight (8) teams to advance to participate in the quarter-final round of the Competition.

The quarter-final round of competition requires each team to submit an appeal brief of up to 30 pages, based on the Moot Court Hypothetical. The Moot Court Hypothetical will be announced Friday, August 15, 2014.

The submitted briefs are reviewed and judged by practicing media law attorneys.  The four teams with the highest-scoring briefs will participate in semi-final arguments during the Annual Conference on Thursday, February 5, 2015.  

The two finalist teams will present their oral arguments on the first day of the Annual Conference, Friday, February 6, 2015, before prominent sitting judges.

Click here to apply. There is no fee to apply or participate! Register by Monday, April 14, 2014 for the priority deadline.  The final deadline is Friday, May 30, 2014.

“I would highly recommend law students to enter the Diversity Moot Court Competition, particularly those of you interested in media and communications law. The chance of winning a trip and attending the ABA Media Law Conference is reason enough to enter. After last year's competition, I was able to meet some of this country's leading attorneys practicing in the area of communications law for private law firms, media companies, the federal government, and nonprofit organizations.

The Competition also provides a valuable opportunity to sharpen legal research, writing, and oral advocacy skills. Working collaboratively with my partner on the brief on last year's creative and challenging hypothetical case was both fun and a great learning experience. The feedback I received during the oral argument rounds was also very helpful, and I was able to put this advice to immediate practice. The judges of the Competition did not only offer sound technical advice about oral advocacy. As experienced practitioners well acquainted with media law, the judges, in their questioning, were able to engage with the issues on a level not common to moot court competitions.

Overall, the Diversity Moot Court Competition was an extremely rewarding, challenging, and enjoyable experience.”

Matthew Maddox, Yale Law School, 2011

COMPETITION ADMINISTRATION AND SPONSORS

The First Amendment and Media Law Diversity Moot Court Competition is administered by the American Bar Association Forum on Communications Law. The Competition Committee, which is comprised of media lawyers, in-house counsel at national media companies, and tenured and visiting law school faculty, will oversee the administration of the Competition.

The 2013-14 Competition was made possible by the generous support of the following companies and law firms:

Brown Rudnick
Butzel Long
Counts Law Group
Davis Wright Tremaine
Haynes & Boone
Hiscox Insurance
Jackson Walker
Kelley Drye
Lathrop & Gage
Levine Sullivan Koch & Schulz
Sheppard Mullin
Thomas & LoCicero
Vinson & Elkins
Wilkinson Barker Knauer

Co-Sponsored by:

National Black Law Students Association
National Latino/a Law Student Association
National Native American Law Students Association
National Asian Pacific American Law Students Association

 

ABOUT THE FORUM

The more than 2,500 members of the American Bar Association Forum on Communications Law regularly represent media and telecommunications companies in litigation and regulatory and transactional matters, among other things. The principal objectives of the Forum are: (1) to encourage discussion of issues relating to the legal counseling and representation of the print media, the telecommunications industry, and the electronic media; (2) to support and promote research, forums and publications focusing on communications and media law; and (3) to keep abreast of developments in communications and media law. In addition, the Forum understands and appreciates the value of a diverse legal profession. It is committed to diversifying its membership and to participating in activities and programs that expand opportunities for minority students and attorneys to become active members of the legal profession and the media bar in particular. The Competition is designed in part to facilitate these objectives.

For any questions about the competition, or to reach the Competition Committee, please contact Carolyn Forrest.  



See photos from the 2011 Oral Argument Competition held in Rancho Mirage, California

Advertisement