Thursday, March 22, 2012

9:00 a.m. – 12:00 p.m.
Public Service Project
Join us for an environmental restoration service project in cooperation with TreeUtah. Participants will plant seedlings and small trees to add to the existing riparian habitat along the Jordan River. Local avian ecologists have designated the Jordan River riparian ecosystem as critical habitat for ninety-eight species of song birds which require lower elevation riparian habitat. This riparian ecosystem is also a crucial stopover for hundreds of thousands of migrating birds each season. Participants should dress for planting and bring work gloves! To volunteer, please indicate your interest when registering. This activity is part of the Section’s One Million Trees Project, which has the goal to plant one million trees by 2014. For more information, visit www.ambar.org/EnvironTrees. For questions, contact Julie Connell, Program Assistant, at Julie.Connell@americanbar.org.

10:00 a.m.
Registration Opens

1:00 p.m. – 1:15 p.m.
Welcome and Opening Remarks
Roger R. Martella, Jr., Sidley Austin LLP, Washington, DC
Irma S. Russell, Section Chair, Dean and Professor, The University of Montana School of Law, Missoula, MT

1:15 p.m. – 1:45 p.m.
Keynote Address

Speaker:
Robert M. Sussman, Senior Policy Counsel to the Administrator, Office of the Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC

1:45 p.m. – 3:15 p.m.
Plenary Session—The Rise of the NGOs as the Drivers of Environmental Law
With the pace of environmental legislation at a standstill and environmental group scrutiny of the strength and stringency of environmental regulations, environmental nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) are increasingly taking matters into their own hands. In recent years, both long-standing and newly established NGOs have been leading the charge before regulatory agencies and the courts in pursuing new regulations and judicial decisions that advance their environmental agendas. Recent trend-setting actions include orchestrated litigation in fifty states to pursue climate change controls under the public trust doctrine, petitions before the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) resulting in significant new regulations, citizen suit actions seeking to enforce environmental laws and permit actions, and landmark settlements under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) that will fundamentally change government approaches to the act’s implementation. The session will bring together leading drivers of the NGO strategy to describe the tools they are using and the goals they are pursuing, as well as representatives of industry trade associations to describe their response. Focusing on examples of recent cases and legal actions, the discussion will address the legal tools that NGOs are increasingly employing to change and advance environmental laws, regulation, litigation, the government’s responses and defenses to such initiatives, and industry’s legal strategy in response.

Moderator:
Roger R. Martella, Jr., Sidley Austin LLP, Washington, DC

Speakers:
Douglas T. Nelson, CropLife, Vice President and General Counsel, Washington, DC
Kassie Siegel, Director, Climate Law Institute, Center for Biological Diversity, Joshua Tree, CA
Joanne Spalding, Senior Managing Attorney, Sierra Club, San Francisco, CA

3:15 p.m. – 3:30 p.m.
Networking Break

3:30 p.m. – 5:00 p.m.
Concurrent Breakout Sessions

The Rise of the Constitution: How Core Constitutional Law Principles Are Shaping Environmental Law
While the Constitution has always exerted a profound and continuing influence on environmental law in a variety of ways, the assertion of bedrock principles has been playing an increasing role in environmental law in the last several years. Recent landmark cases, including American Electric Power v. Connecticut, Massachusetts v. EPA, and National Meat Ass’n v. Harris (pending), demonstrate the Constitution’s profound influence on the enactment of laws. These influences include tensions in jurisdiction between state and federal governments, protection of property rights, and standing to sue to effects on interstate commerce, on the relevance of treaties, and, of course, on due process and equal protection. This panel will address the current constitutional law constraints facing environmental law constituencies including practitioners, courts, and regulators, with examples from recent key decisions and upcoming litigation.
Moderator:
James R. May, Professor of Law, Widener University School of Law School, Wilmington, DE
Speakers:
Norman A. Dupont, Richards Watson Gershon, Los Angeles, CA
Patricia Ross McCubbin, Professor, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL
Ethan G. Shenkman, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC
** Young Lawyers Panel
Letting Mother Nature Do the Work: The Role of Ecosystem Services in Satisfying Environmental Legal Requirements
In the face of aging infrastructure, financial insecurity, and unhealthy urban ecosystems, finding innovative ways to fulfill legal mandates for environmental requirements is a top priority. Using ecosystem services to mitigate pollution and to provide future resilience may be the answer, but significant legal questions remain regarding whether such opportunities satisfy requirements. The cheapest and quickest way to achieve environmental compliance may be to let nature do the work. Clean Water Act compliance for stormwater systems may be achieved by installing rain gardens and detention basin parks. Watershed conservation may be achieved by using sustainable forestry and sustainable agriculture. Thermal pollution from power plants may be mitigated by the creation of marshes and wetlands while also creating habitat. Superfund sites have become solar energy farms using the power generated in the treatment of contaminated soil and water. This panel will examine the use of ecosystem services, sustainable design, and green planning to obtain environmental compliance in ways that benefit both regulated industry and the public. The focus will be on how such options have been used successfully to remedy legal disputes or otherwise satisfy legal requirements in environmental laws, regulations, and consent decrees.
Moderator:
Robert B. McKinstry, Jr., Ballard Spahr LLP, Philadelphia, PA
Speakers:
Randy E. Hayman, General Counsel, District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority, Washington, DC
Margaret E. Peloso, Vinson & Elkins, Washington, DC
Sarah E. Stevenson, Assistant City Solicitor, City of Philadelphia Law Department, Philadelphia Water Department, Philadelphia, PA
Is the Grass Greener? Hot Topics in EU Environmental Law
While environmental issues and regulatory actions dominate much political debate in the United States, our colleagues overseas are wrestling with many of the same issues, including how to reconcile economic development with environmental protection, how to address shared environmental problems and impacts, and how to advance and pay for protection in a period of economic crisis. These are increasingly important issues for U.S. practitioners as European Union (EU) laws will impact multinational clients and serve as models for regulations throughout the world. A panel of EU environmental practitioners and experts will address pressing issues facing the EU, contrast them with U.S. developments, and provide perspectives on counseling clients with footprints on both sides of the Atlantic.
Moderator:
Clara Marie Poffenberger, ExxonMobil Corporation, Fairfax, VA
Speakers:
Tim Clare, Technical Director, WSP Environment & Energy, London, United Kingdom
Dr. Bettina Enderle, Allen & Overy LLP, Frankfurt, Germany
Kristina Nordlander, Sidley Austin LLP, Brussels, Belgium
** Young Lawyers Panel
Transactions Today: An Update for New, Gently Used, and Road-Hardened Environmental Lawyers
With many environmental lawyers expanding their practice areas or just starting out in the field, the transactional side of the practice such as permitting, compliance, remediation, and due diligence is a critical core expertise. Even seasoned lawyers are running into new issues. A panel of experienced transactional lawyers will discuss the kinds of environmental issues that typically arise in transactions, as well as some novel and unusual things they are running into now. What are those issues? What are some of the ways in which they can be managed? What are some recommended contract terms? Is there insurance available to cover these issues? What issues come up when dealing with environmental consultants? What are the roles of in-house and outside counsel? What are the unique ethical issues which may arise? This panel will cover issues of interest to both newer and experienced lawyers.
Moderator:
Claudia Rast, Butzel Long, Ann Arbor, MI
Speakers:
Jon Schuyler Brooks, Phillips Nizer LLP, New York, NY
Michael O. Hill, The RACER Trust, Ypsilanti, MI
Heidi McIntosh, Associate Director, Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, Salt Lake City, UT

5:00 p.m. – 5:15 p.m.
Networking Break

5:15 p.m. – 6:30 p.m.
Technical Roundtable Presentations
The technical roundtable presentations offer the opportunity to interact with some of the nation’s top environmental consultants and service providers. The roundtable format will include time for discussion during three 20-minute roundtable presentations of your choice.

AlterEcho—A Risk Worth Taking: Risk Assessment Approach to Cost Allocation
Bloomberg BNA—Chemical and Consumer Products: The New Battle Frontier
Exponent, Inc.—Hydraulic Fracturing: Separating the Realities from the Myths
Geosyntec Consultants, Inc.—Challenges and Strategies for Managing Complex Sites Impacting Natural Resources
Quest Consulting, Inc.—How FORENSICS Can Make a Difference in Identifying PRPs
Woodard & Curran, Inc.—Solving the Nutrient Nightmare: How Technology Advancements Impact Clean Water Act Compliance and Enforcement Strategy

6:30 p.m. – 7:30 p.m.
Welcome Reception (cash bar)

7:30 p.m. – 9:30 p.m.
Section Dinner (ticketed)
Wm. T. (Bill) Robinson III, President, American Bar Association, Frost Brown Todd LLC, Florence, KY

Back to Top

Friday, March 23, 2012

7:30 a.m.
Breakfast and Registration

8:20 a.m. - 8:30 a.m.
Opening Remarks
Wendy Bowden Crowther, 2013 Program Chair, Clyde Snow & Sessions, PC, Salt Lake City, UT

8:30 a.m. – 10:00 a.m.
Plenary Session—Environmental Protection on the Chopping Block? How Environmental Law and Enforcement Will Respond to Funding Cuts and Other Restrictions
The year 2011 saw several key events that will significantly impact federal environmental and natural resource agencies over both the short and long term, including the budget crisis debate, a near government shutdown, a debt crisis and accord that threatens funding cuts across all agencies, and finally, a job creation debate. Against this backdrop, Congress has debated riders and bills restricting or delaying EPA and the U.S. Department of the Interior legal authority over issues such as the ESA, toxic emissions, and greenhouse gas regulation (GHG), arguing that regulations hurt job growth and the economy. Finally, the 2012 elections loom with the future of environmental regulation likely to remain a key concern dividing the parties. This panel will present differing perspectives on how the overall state of fiscal austerity ultimately will impact environmental law and enforcement, including impacts to regulatory agendas, the stringency of new rules, and environmental enforcement initiatives.

Moderator:
John C. Cruden, President, The Environmental Law Institute, Washington, DC

Speakers:
Cynthia Giles, Assistant Administrator for the Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC
Mary B. Neumayr, Senior Energy Counsel, Committee on Energy and Commerce, U.S. House of Representatives
Alice Busching Reynolds, Deputy Secretary for Law Enforcement and Counsel, California Environmental Protection Agency, Sacramento, CA

10:00 a.m. – 10:30 a.m.
Networking Break

10:30 a.m. – 12:00 p.m.
Concurrent Breakout Sessions

** Young Lawyers Panel
Time and Scale: Emerging Challenges to NEPA and the ESA
Time and scale are constants in environmental law. As the ESA and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) have matured, issues of time and scale have emerged as some of the toughest concerns confronting stakeholders, agencies, and the courts. For example, what is the appropriate period of analysis for a biological opinion? Recent court decisions assessing biological opinions for aquatic species have arrived at different numbers. What can courts and regulated parties expect in a world where climatic conditions appear more uncertain? Can the agencies provide the certainty demanded by courts and parties? Similarly, the courts and the public continue to expect large-scale programmatic NEPA documentation and extensive NEPA documentation for broad-scale rulemakings. Is NEPA up to the task and can agencies provide adequate analysis of vast projects or programmatic actions? This panel will tackle the challenges of time and scale that the courts increasingly grapple with in ESA and NEPA litigation.
Moderator:
Jean E. Williams, Environment and Natural Resources Division, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC
Speakers:
James Kilbourne, Chief, Appellate Section, Environmental and Natural Resources Division, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC
Kate Poole, Natural Resources Defense Council, San Francisco, CA
Sandi Snodgrass, Holland & Hart LLP, Denver, CO
Identifying and Negotiating Cost Allocation Among Potentially Responsible Parties: History, Science, and Money
Companies can face extensive costs for property damage related to soil and groundwater contamination; these costs can be especially acute in Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) settings, with its joint and several liability scheme for site cleanup costs, and in natural resource damages cost recovery/sharing cases. In this panel, practitioners and outside experts will discuss their experience with soil and groundwater contamination matters and show how historical and scientific research can be used to inform parties of their potential liability and guide their negotiating stance with other parties. The session will discuss situations where historians and scientists worked collaboratively on such cases in a manner that produced a more accurate and nuanced understanding of a site’s past, in turn assisting lawyers in identifying, characterizing, and negotiating with potentially responsible parties, conferring with other parties and regulatory agencies, and developing appropriate cost allocation models for past and future site remediation costs.
Moderator:
Gerard A. Caron, Cabot Corporation, Boston, MA
Speakers:
Kenneth W. Patterson, Acting Deputy Director, Office of Site Remediation Enforcement, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC
Kristin N. Reyna, Gordon & Rees, LLP, San Diego, CA
Steve Swisdak, Deputy Director of Litigation Research, History Associates Incorporated, Rockville, MA
Getting Real About “Growing Communities”—How New Laws and Regulation Are Changing the Game of Urban Expansion
Legal doctrines central to municipal water supply planning are undergoing a wave of adaptations to accommodate shifting priorities and uncertainty about future water supply. This wave of new laws and rulings is affecting urban growth throughout the nation. In the western United States urban growth is primarily regulated through municipal water rights. In the East, urban growth may be restrained by water quality and stormwater regulation. This panel will address the effects these laws are having on urban growth throughout the United States and will examine how uncertainty about municipal water supply and urban growth may lead to interstate challenges.
Moderator:
Elizabeth Newlin Taylor, Taylor & McCaleb, P.A., Corrales, NM
Speakers:
Adam Gravley, Gordon Derr, Seattle, WA
Justice Gregory J. Hobbs, Jr., Colorado Supreme Court, Denver, CO
Frank Matthews, Hopping Green & Sams, Tallahassee, FL
** Young Lawyers Panel
Developments in Greenhouse Gas Regulations: EPA, Courts, and Legislatures
With EPA’s first GHG rules being implemented in 2012 and a heavy agenda of upcoming rules, this panel will review the first two years of implementation—focusing on the successes, achievements, compliance difficulties, and failures experienced by EPA and the industry. The panel will also examine Texas’s showdown with EPA and the state challenges to the endangerment finding and EPA’s regulation of GHGs—all pending at the D.C. Circuit. The panel will also discuss forthcoming GHG regulation including next steps with New Source Performance Standards for GHGs and key judicial decision-impacting GHG regulation, such as the Supreme Court case Conn. v. AEP and similar cases in other courts. Finally, any legislative actions to address GHGs at federal or state levels will be summarized.
Moderator:
James Coleman, Harvard Law School, Cambridge, MA
Speakers:
Richard DeSanti, Chevron Corporation, San Ramon, CA
David Doniger, Natural Resources Defense Council, Washington, DC
Avi Garbow, Office of General Counsel, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC

12:00 p.m. – 1:30 p.m.
Keynote Address: Roundtable Discussion with the Government's Senior Legal Officers
The senior legal officers from the agencies that most impact environmental law at the national level, including the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. Department of Interior, the U.S. Department of Energy, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, and the U.S. Department of Justice, will discuss their perspectives on evolving trends and emerging themes in environmental law.

Speakers:
Scott C. Fulton, General Counsel, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC
Gary S. Guzy, Deputy Director and General Counsel, White House Council on Environmental Quality, Washington, DC
Ethan G. Shenkman, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC

1:30 p.m. – 3:00 p.m.
** Young Lawyers Panel
Plenary Session—Hydraulic Fracturing on Trial: Possibilities, Pollution, and Preemption
Departing from a standard panel-based format, this plenary session will put key legal issues surrounding hydraulic fracturing on trial before a panel of expert judges. The session will begin with a presentation on the preemption in hydraulic fracturing that describes the hypothetical decision of a lower court that (1) the State of New Union’s outright ban on hydraulic fracturing was unconstitutional, and (2) the state’s hydraulic fracturing regulations (promulgated before the ban took effect) are preempted by federal storm water, wastewater, and drinking water laws. An appellant and an appellee will argue the case in front of a panel of “judges” who are legal experts in this area, with the judges’ decision to be rendered at the end of the discussion, with further follow-up in the following breakout.

Introductions/Moderator:
Bruce Baizel, Senior Staff Attorney, Earthworks, Durango, CO

Advocates: (Speakers):
Barclay Richard Nicholson, Fulbright and Jaworski, Houston, TX
Denise A Rubin, Napoli Bern Ripka Shkolnik, LLP, New York, NY

Judges:
Bernadette Rappold, Special Litigation and Projects Division, Office of Civil Enforcement U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
George A. Rusk, Vice President, Ecology and Environment, Inc., Lancaster, NY
Gail Wurtzler, Davis, Graham & Stubbs, Denver, CO

3:00 p.m. – 3:30 p.m.
Networking Break

3:30 p.m. – 5:00 p.m.
Concurrent Breakout Sessions

** Young Lawyers Panel
Hydraulic Fracturing on Trial, Part 2: Recap—Judges’ Discussion of Emerging State and Interstate Hydraulic Fracturing Controversies
In a follow-up to the preceding plenary session, the judges and advocates will discuss the decision in greater detail. In addition, topics related to various legal issues surrounding hydraulic fracturing will be discussed, including issues arising as municipalities, counties, states, and interstate commissions from New England to Texas consider bans, partial bans, and new regulatory programs to manage the impacts to water quality and public health from hydraulic fracturing activities.
Moderator:
Emily Collins, Professor, University of Pittsburgh School of Law, Pittsburgh, PA
Speakers:
Bernadette Rappold, Special Litigation and Projects Division, Office of Civil Enforcement U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
George A. Rusk, Vice President, Ecology and Environment, Inc., Lancaster, NY
Gail Wurtzler, Davis, Graham & Stubbs, Denver, CO
Advocates: (Speakers):
Barclay Richard Nicholson, Fulbright and Jaworski, Houston, TX
Denise A Rubin, Napoli Bern Ripka Shkolnik, LLP, New York, NY
Energy Projects off the Reservation: Pursuing Consultation and Conflict Resolution When Energy Development Impacts Tribal Resources Beyond Trust Lands
Increasingly, large-scale energy projects, including utility-scale wind and solar projects, transmission lines, pipelines, and conventional projects such as mining, oil and gas wells, and hydroelectric projects, are being cited as threats to tribal cultural property even when such projects are not constructed on Indian reservations. Most Indian tribes have cultural and religious ties to places beyond the boundaries of the reservations. Energy projects that involve federal lands or require federal approvals are subject to review under federal laws including the NEPA and the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA). Like NEPA, failure to comply with the NHPA regulations can result in a court setting aside the offending federal action. Early consultation with tribes can avoid conflicts, and when conflicts cannot be avoided, the NHPA process provides a framework for reaching agreements on how to resolve adverse effects and increase the defensibility of the project. This panel will provide an overview of cultural property disputes and the NHPA process in the context of energy development.
Moderator:
Andrew C. Mergen, Environment and Natural Resources Division, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC
Speakers:
Eric Shepard, Colorado River Indian Tribes, Parker, AZ
Brian R. Turner, Senior Field Officer/Attorney, National Trust for Historic Preservation, San Francisco, CA
Jennifer H. Weddle, Greenberg Traurig, Denver, CO
** Young Lawyers Panel
Environmental Enforcement: What to Expect?
Covering both civil and criminal enforcement, this panel will provide practical information for practitioners regarding federal enforcement initiatives, including areas on which the government will be focusing: what industries likely will be targeted; trends in penalties; significant, recent, and ongoing enforcement actions; legal theories being argued; and recent developments in applicable law. The panel will also discuss EPA penalty policies, including their purpose, how they actually work, and tips for presenting mitigation factors, as well as other strategies for reducing clients’ exposure.
Moderator:
Michael Chernekoff, Jones Walker, Houston, TX
Speakers:
Bruce S. Gelber, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Environmental and Natural Resources Division, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC
Adam M. Kushner, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Washington, DC
Catherine D. Little, Hunton & Williams, Atlanta, GA
Roles, Responsibilities, and Ethical Considerations of In-House Counsel Related to Responding to Government Inquiries
This panel will address the scope of the government’s authority to initiate criminal prosecutions based on the information obtained during administrative or civil proceedings. The panel will explore, among others, the following questions: When can legal advocacy by in-house counsel lead to charges of obstruction? What guidelines should in-house counsel and outside counsel follow in representing their clients in such situations? What is the risk that privileged documents will have to be surrendered to the government or when might responses to information requests be used for criminal prosecution? Are two recent prosecutions indicative of a trend or do they represent an anomaly? Will the government’s approach create a “chilling effect” for in-house counsel attempting to zealously represent their respective clients in responding to governmental inquiries and investigations? When might the use of information violate a defendant’s Fourth Amendment right against unlawful search and seizure? And what are the ethical and professional responsibility considerations of in-house counsel and outside counsel advising in such investigations? The panel will explore these questions and will highlight how the day-to-day role of in-house counsel could expose the individuals to criminal prosecution. The panel will also provide helpful guidance and practical tips on ways in which in-house counsel can minimize their own potential liability.
Moderator:
Chris A. Radke, Chevron USA Inc., Houston, TX
Speakers:
Richard E. Byrne, Assistant Chief Attorney, Environmental & Safety Law Department, Exxon Mobil Corporation, Fairfax, VA
Kris Dighe, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC
Mary Spearing, Baker Botts, LLP, Washington, DC

5:00 p.m. – 6:00 p.m.
Speed Networking Event
You’ve probably heard of “Speed Dating,” but what about “Speed Networking”? Young lawyer and law student attendees will meet one-on-one with seasoned environment, energy, and resources law practitioners over the course of an hour. This is the place to network and seek general advice from your colleagues and potential mentors, and to discuss Section activities and initiatives that may be of interest.

6:00 p.m. – 7:00 p.m.
Reception (cash bar)
This reception will give Speed Networking participants a chance to continue their conversations.

Back to Top

Saturday, March 24, 2012

7:30 a.m. – 8:30 a.m.
Breakfast

8:30 a.m. – 10:00 a.m.
Plenary Session—Federal Air Regulation of the Energy Sector: What to Expect for Oil, Natural Gas, and Coal
In light of the sweeping federal air regulations that impact the energy generation, production, extraction, and transmission sector, this session will discuss the impacts of regulations on creating incentives to further a new clean air economy as well as the concern that industry is facing over-regulation with negative economic impacts. This panel comprised of representatives will address the range of air compliance issues facing the energy sector, and how those regulations are implemented and affecting the industry: GHG reporting and management, compliance issues, environmental benefits, and energy security. Lastly, the panel will discuss how to move forward under these regulations and what EPA is focusing on today. Regulations that will be discussed include the Cross State Air Pollution Rule (interstate transport rule), upcoming Section 111 regulations for electric generating units (EGUs) and oil refineries, EGU Mercury and Air Toxics Rules (New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) and National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs)), NSPS rule for oil and gas industry, other NESHAPs (i.e., ICI Boiler) and National Ambient Air Quality Standards (SO2, ozone), and other regulatory initiatives coming down the pipe.

Moderator:
Richard Alonso, Bracewell & Giuliani LLP, Washington, DC

Speakers:
Joel Beauvais, Special Counsel to the Office of the Administrator, Office of General Counsel, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC
Janet J. Henry, American Electric Power Service Corporation, Columbus, OH
Amy Trojecki, Regulatory Strategy Manager, Federal Regulatory Affairs and Policy, Exelon Corporation, Washington, DC

10:00 a.m. – 10:30 a.m.
Networking Break

10:30 a.m. – 12:00 p.m.
Ethical Issues Associated with the Latest Trends and Technologies Including Working in the “Cloud”
Whether operating in the “Cloud” or using Internet-based services to disseminate information about the law and legal services as well as to attract new clients, a lawyer’s use of technology will continue to grow. As technology evolves at an unprecedented pace, so does its ethical implications for lawyers in all practice areas and settings. This panel will engage participants in a discussion about those ethical issues and the recent technology-related proposals of the ABA Commission on Ethics 20/20.

Moderator:
Pamela R. Esterman, Sive, Paget & Riesel, P.C., New York, NY

Speakers:
Hon. Daniel J. Crothers, Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, State Capitol, Bismarck, ND
Craig D. Galli, Holland & Hart LLP, Salt Lake City, UT
Ellyn S. Rosen, Regulation Counsel, ABA Center for Professional Responsibility, Chicago, IL

12:00 p.m.
Closing Remarks
Sean T. Dixon, 2014 Program Chair, Clean Ocean Action, Highlands, NJ

Back to Top

Advertisement

CLE Events and Information | 41st Annual Conference on Environmental Law

CLE Credit

Schedule

CLE Credit Information